RSS .92| RSS 2.0| ATOM 0.3
  • Introduction
  • Contact
  •  

    Outcomes / Reflections on the Lab

    July 3rd, 2007

    Outcomes / Reflections on the Lab

    Trusting my processes of making and not trying to understand the work in a critical, analytical way but being wholley in the process of making and trusting that process.

    Reflecting back on my initial questions and looking at the changes in my thinking about the process of making.

    Wanting to use the Dream Matrix in the initial stages of making something, trying that out with collaborators.

    The web/dvd as a ’slice’ of Pendulum, Rotations, writings, images and reflections of my time in the Lab - as a website that can be copied onto disc for ease of use etc. I am imagining that this is a section on my own website that is linked to the main choreographic lab website.

    Missing the crossover time during summer meant that the work perhaps didn’t develop as much as it could have. Had I had people poping in and giving feedback and ideas etc.

    Practical support - use of space and equipment was great - wish that I had done more practical work.


    Intertextual Responses on Sara’s Triptyc 12th May 2007

    May 12th, 2007

    voice speech old frail loss, white hair, wash away, frament remains, softness of the body young, podgy, soft, old tired loose, snow muffled fire water air, fingers and arm crosses across the camera, relationship between the 3 images - creating a narrative connection, table carriying body - a body dragging itself across the floor pulling the tired body draining the strength away. red material floating in and out of the cameras eye. black white surround - symbols, hiding hide and seek, resting standing arm swings down. body hangs off the raised arm. pulling the body down water overlapping the shoulders then what? the face head summerged, sinking swallowed by the vastness of the ocean the vastness of life swamped by it all, a yearning for something that is invisible, a big sigh, lulled by the music voices sending me off someplace else, some otherness, other place, a place that is muffled and padded with cotton wool. squeeky.

    haiku

    a body dragging
    sunk - swallowed by the vastness
    let the breath go out


    Image - Kerryn

    September 15th, 2006

    KerrynImage


    Intertextual Resonances – Score Zero

    September 10th, 2006

    It is the end of the day and I am sitting on a hard-backed green chair in Isham light with Guy. I am feeling a little bit frustrated having spent 3 hours trawling through DV tapes for some footage that wasn’t there.

    Chips
    Daddy
    Bird
    Mathew Bourne’s male swan lake
    Charlie
    Nostalgic 70’s dads
    Silence
    Black
    Green bird low light
    Purple face
    One leg
    Fall feet
    Black and flesh
    Muffled breath
    ? is this the end
    is there more
    flapping arms
    straight back
    shaved head
    beak
    horizontal line blurred across screen

    skin flesh body silky smooth curved - soft light on white skin – downy fur – its looks cool but is actually deceptively warm and radiates heat – its awakening to the world –

    as the arms flap I am reminded of Mathew Bourne’s male Nutcracker and I notice that Robert could be one of the male swans – I think of watching my friend Tom perform as one of these swans and begin to see their physical likeness. I think of the ballet and representations of birds in a dancers body – I think that Rob has got the movement ‘right’. I am drawn to the starkness of the image, the black and white (and pale green) the limited movement and blurring of the edges of the body.

    I want to try being this bird – I want to try on the beak – but then maybe I don’t as I couldn’t look the same – maybe I don’t even want it to move at all but to just be very still as the camera zooms in.


    Responses to ‘tea and cakes’, Nottdance 2006

    May 19th, 2006

    I was speaking to Steph Crawford, dance development worker for Dance 4 who sat in on our tea and cakes event. She gave me some feedback that I wanted to share. She benefited from sitting and listening at the event and felt that it was framed well and the right number of people involved. It made her re-focus on her work as an artist and maker that has been lost under her title as ‘development worker’. She did make a couple of comments that could be useful to us in similar future events. She found it hard to watch the videos whilst somebody was talking as it felt that she wasn’t giving full attention to either. Perhaps we needed to have specific breaks for the video? She also found that the ‘conch’ although a good tool inhibited peoples flow - its always so difficult in these types of events. In hindsight I believe that with the type of people who took part in the event, that we could have allowed it to be freer, and that participants would have recognised the need for space and silence within that. I hope this is useful.


    Considering technology in performance

    April 21st, 2006

    Kerryn Wise on negotiating the dance/live art/technology nexus.
    Format: mp3
    Length: 17.59min
    Size: 8.2Mg


    My Lab Research - Update

    April 12th, 2006

    I find myself at a place where I am starting to understand how my lab research is going to develop. My initial project was focused on investigating my methods of creating work. To try to gain a fuller understanding of why I make work, and why certain images are constantly arising and never fully explored. I am not seeing these repeated moments as problems, but to acknowledge them as key images and to become more consciously aware of their presence in my work.

    I am excited by technology and the visual; the seduction of the screen image, the uniqueness of the light of the projection and its effect on a space, and how this light can be manipulated in relation to the body. What I am noticing is that as my focus is consumed by the technology I often miss the fundamental element that is the body, the dancer, the skin and flesh – the articulation of something through a non-verbal language. I can become so wrapped up in the possibilities of re-shaping space and reality through projection, the moving body becomes secondary and often overlooked. I feel that this balance needs to change.

    I wanted to challenge myself to create something that strips away the camera, lights and projector to see what I am left with. Is there a way to articulate what I want to say with the body alone? Can I create movement that relates to the haptic sense for both the dancers and audience? This is something I have never attempted to do without a video camera and evokes feelings of both fear and excitement.

    I was asked to create a piece of work for Nottingham Community Dance Company. The company is made up of dance teachers, development workers, and those with a passion for contemporary dance. I began to work with 3 dancers: Lucy - an ex-professional dancer who is now a dance therapist, Phil - a primary school teacher with a love of dance and Becci – a marketing manager who trained in dance but didn’t want to pursue it as a career. This is where my research process began.

    I decided that for this piece there would be no video or technical elements, no stylised costumes or sets, only the bodies in space - pure movement? I wanted to find a way for the dancers to embody the movement, to discover a dance language that is felt, and to attempt to articulate that to an audience. I wanted to learn how to develop this through the way that I articulate the movement vocabulary to the dancers and in the ways that I set tasks and work with each dancer as an individual with a different dance and body history. I wanted some of each dancers personality to be felt through the choreography as well as something of me being felt to.

    I began to work alone in the studio playing with moving wherever my body wanted to go, something I noticed early on in my explorations in the studio was that the dance language that I was playing with was much softer and more fluid than any language I have used when working alongside technology. Maybe this is just where I am at, or maybe it reflects my constant attempt to struggle against the technology through the choreographic vocabulary.

    Working with these dancers is great – I have bodies to work on, on a weekly basis, the downside is that they do want a finished piece to perform in July. So I can do my own investigations and try different things out but ultimately I have to make and set choreographic material…I’m not entirely such what we will end up with. Will my work be boring without the visual and technical elements?

    This process happened to coincide with a Bonnie Bird bursary I was awarded to work with a choreographic mentor. Nicky Malloy suggested that Charles Linehan could be somebody good to work with, and so I went to London to see his work and have met with him once so far. Charles work seems to be wholly embodied by the
    dancer’s that he works with. There is an ease with which the dancers move within his unique vocabulary. I am planning to sit in an observe him making his new piece, to see how he articulates vocabulary to the dancers and to see his creative processes. I feel that this will really help my processes of making.

    A Finished Piece?

    The NCDC piece of choreography is being premiered next week. I feel apprehensive about sharing this work, as it feels bare and undercooked. The work feels very different from my previous work, and I feel that I will be criticised or somehow disappoint the audience, that it lacks something.

    Although I am scared of showing this piece it also feels exciting to have set myself the challenge and to have done it. Therefore it has been successful whatever the reaction.

    The piece feels lonely, empty; but there is a sculptural beauty to the way the dancers move and follow their own choreographic journeys, sometimes ‘bumping’ into someone else and sharing a moment.

    The beginning of the piece feels more clear to me that the rest. There is a quiet confidence to the dancers presence and a trance-like quality descends on me when I watch them moving. The second part seems less ‘felt’ and more structured, set. The material becomes a little more obvious and expected.


    Tuesday 20th December 2005

    December 20th, 2005

    FOCUSING

    Jane ran a focussing session. Details of the structure for how to focus were given to us in hard copy. I worked with Vida. We developed the apparently normal focusing procedure by taking it into sound and movement rather than words. One person focuses the other listens and “reflects back”.

    My questions were:

    First exercise: “The World?’” I giggled at this because its such an enormous question, why wouldn’t one have a problem with it. Also it is typical of me to choose such an enormous subject.

    Second exercise, where the question had to be more related to an issue within the lab: “Why do I want to set my work?”

    My experience: I felt a Xmas tree on the front of my body - its star just at the apex of the v at the bottom of my sternum. I laughed since it so close to Xmas how corny to have a Xmas tree. The star at the top of the tree was cover over by something brown. Words I used were BROWN COLOUR; SHIT, COW PAT, BROOWN DIRT…. Then I realised it was really the colour and texture of brown paint powder like we used to us in school. This was the most fitting image – a small mound of brown paint powder. I lifted my fist and brought it down on the mound to disperse it as I discovered. Then I rubbed it over my body until I was covered in brown paint powder. I was brown. Then I wondered “what does it need”……WATER…its too dry….paint powder needs to be mixed with water. So I stood under a shower…which although it solved the dry powder issue, meant that the powder just washed down the plughole. But it meant I was CLEAN, I was CLEAR. There was cleanness, there was clarity.

    ISADORA

    In the afternoon Kerryn and Barret showed us what Isadora was which was very interesting. I thought I would only be interested in the masking aspect of it but looking at it again perhaps there are other functions of it need to explore…. e.g.

    - Running various voice-movement scores/people alongside one another.
    - Creating a chorus


    First slices

    May 12th, 2005

    The lab is a very particular opportunity – to have junctions of connection with a group of artists over time; to develop an accumulating knowledge of their projects and questions – what will mutate, what remain, what fall away. It is always easier to imagine a clarity in other people’s work than one’s own – so a few first slices:

    Guy
    Finding a language between movement and voice
    How to set material through video – create ‘music’ through video editing process

    Robert
    Scores
    Wanting left-overs

    Kerryn
    Video projection and live mixing
    Haptic visuality

    Sara
    The spaces in between
    How do the choreographer/lecturer/facilitator roles fit together?
    ‘the splinter in the eye is the best magnifying glass’

    Anna
    Try to step back, ‘absorbed so much I don’t know where it comes from anymore’
    Body as a meaning-maker

    Vida
    Carry physical history as well as intellectual history with you
    how is theory embedded in the work?
    Relation to audience

    Jane
    Movement/voice/video with and against each other
    I am the field site for the ethnography
    ‘felt sense’

    Gill Clarke, May 2005